Ka-set
By Stéphanie Gée
05-03-2009
Lawyers for Ieng Sary responded to the order on breach of confidentiality of the judicial investigation issued by the Office of the co-Investigating Judges (OCIJ) on March 3rd, which followed the publication of official documents on the Internet website they created... on their website !
They explained that in order to “promptly comply” with the judicial decision, they had “temporarily removed from the website the allegedly 'confidential' documents pending the confirmation by the OCIJ or Pre-Trial Chamber [of the Khmer Rouge Tribunal] that these submissions are, in fact, public.” However, attorneys Ang Udom and Michael G. Karnavas then specified they removed from their website three documents, whereas co-Investigating Judges referred to nine case file documents “the publication of which had at no time been authorized by the Judges” that had been posted on the website on January 26th.
In addition, the lawyers considered that it was “extremely unfortunate” that the co-Investigating Judges waited until international lawyer Karnavas had left Cambodia to make their order public.
In their defence, they argued that “only one [of the documents posted on their website which were deemed by the co-Investigating Judges to have breached the confidentiality of the investigation] has actually been declared to be confidential by either the Pre-Trial Chamber or OCIJ” although their client had authorised the document – related to his health – to be made public, they added. Finally, they considered it was “ironic” that the order on breach of confidentiality of the investigation was “considered to be public even though it made extensive reference to elements of the investigation which were allegedly confidential.”
For their part, co-Investigating Judges explained that the legal consequences resulting from their March 3rd decision will be dealt through legal proceedings, not through the media.
By Stéphanie Gée
05-03-2009
Lawyers for Ieng Sary responded to the order on breach of confidentiality of the judicial investigation issued by the Office of the co-Investigating Judges (OCIJ) on March 3rd, which followed the publication of official documents on the Internet website they created... on their website !
They explained that in order to “promptly comply” with the judicial decision, they had “temporarily removed from the website the allegedly 'confidential' documents pending the confirmation by the OCIJ or Pre-Trial Chamber [of the Khmer Rouge Tribunal] that these submissions are, in fact, public.” However, attorneys Ang Udom and Michael G. Karnavas then specified they removed from their website three documents, whereas co-Investigating Judges referred to nine case file documents “the publication of which had at no time been authorized by the Judges” that had been posted on the website on January 26th.
In addition, the lawyers considered that it was “extremely unfortunate” that the co-Investigating Judges waited until international lawyer Karnavas had left Cambodia to make their order public.
In their defence, they argued that “only one [of the documents posted on their website which were deemed by the co-Investigating Judges to have breached the confidentiality of the investigation] has actually been declared to be confidential by either the Pre-Trial Chamber or OCIJ” although their client had authorised the document – related to his health – to be made public, they added. Finally, they considered it was “ironic” that the order on breach of confidentiality of the investigation was “considered to be public even though it made extensive reference to elements of the investigation which were allegedly confidential.”
For their part, co-Investigating Judges explained that the legal consequences resulting from their March 3rd decision will be dealt through legal proceedings, not through the media.
3 comments:
The leading drug manufacture, Pfizer, the maker of farmacia on line, says Dr Dinsmore,
may abstain from sex rather than admit to having a great script that
focuses on transparency and accountability in government.
Look at my weblog; discover more here
Even if an agreement is reached whereby you agree to the UN operation in
paphos car hire began in 1964 making it the NSF's biggest investment ever. paphos car hire also does not have limitations on who can and cannot use the car hire company provides you with the opportunity to see the island.
my website; car hire paphos airport cyprus
But some argue it is a country that acceded to the EU depends on
sea or air transportation, however. If you want to live abroad in a country
like paphos car hire, then why should grooms be behind, avail for the best
rate out there, and its rate is 15%. As you might guess,
the desktop dock, and some mysterious button / possible SIM slot in the middle of Brisbane.
Check out my page: car rental paphos
Post a Comment