Wednesday, 11 August 2010

cotsuratThailand wants border talks with P. Penh


via Khmer NZ

Published: 11/08/2010
Thailand has proposed talks with Cambodia to settle the dispute over the border area claimed by the two countries.

Foreign Minister Kasit Piromya yesterday said a Joint Boundary Committee meeting should be held soon to put the issue on the negotiating table. Thailand was arranging the date and venue of the meeting, he said.

Vasin Teeravechyan leads the Thai delegation to the JBC set up to resolve the unclear boundary dividing the two countries. The forum used the memorandum of understanding (MoU) signed in 2000 as a framework for negotiations.

Thailand yesterday also made diplomatic moves to counter Cambodia on the Preah Vihear temple issue.

Mr Kasit explained the Thai position to the envoys of eight members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations after Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen on Monday called on international involvement in the issue to solve the problem of the disputed area.

The minister has also sent a letter approved by Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva to the presidents of the United Nations Assembly General and the UN Security Council to explain the Thai stance.

The main thrust is that Thailand wants the disputed border to be resolved bilaterally through negotiation.

The prime minister will hold talks with UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon during his visit to the UN headquarters from Sept 20 to 27 to attend the General Assembly, government spokesman Panitan Wattanayagorn said.

The prime minister told reporters at Government House that Thailand would not allow any country to intervene in the disputed area near the Preah Vihear temple.

"There is no need for any foreign country to worry about our problem because we will solve it under the MoU," he said.

Mr Abhisit said Cambodia had violated the memorandum by relocating people to a community set up inside the disputed 4.6 square kilometre area .

He expressed confidence the problems would not escalate.

Relations between Thailand and Cambodia soured again after the World Heritage Committee meeting on July 29 in Brazil delayed approving the management plan for the temple and surrounding area sent by Cambodia. Thailand protested that the area covered by the plan intruded on the overlapping zone.

First Army commander Kanit Sapitak said he and Cambodia's 5th military region commander Bun Seng held talks and shared the view that the two countries should settle the border conflict through negotiation and peaceful means.

Lt Gen Kanit said he and Lt Gen Bun Seng had agreed both armies would avoid armed confrontation and not use force.

Iran, Cambodia pledge to expand ties

via Khmer NZ

Tehran Times Political Desk
Wednesday, August 11, 2010

TEHRAN – Iran and Cambodia are determined to increase all-encompassing relations particularly in economic sphere.

In a meeting between Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki and his Cambodian counterpart Hor Namhong in Tehran on Tuesday, the two sides called for expansion of ties in all areas.

Mottaki said Cambodia is a friend of Iran and that the expansion of ties will benefit both nations.

He also said that everything is ripe for developing trade ties, doing joint projects and investment.

Mottaki also said that the two countries could trade agricultural products including rice.

Namhong expressed hope Phnom Penh and Tehran promote relations in the future.

Thai PM Abhisit tries to clean hands with Yellow Shirts

via Khmer NZ

Tuesday, 10 August 2010 13:41 DAP-NEWS

Thai PM Abhisit who came to power through the support from military and yellow shirts in Bangkok and now he has tried to clean his hands and words which involved in the last demonstration, blocking Sovannaphoum Airport.

Why do we clearly understand about cleaning hands? Because today he was quoted by The Bangkok Post, “Thailand was committed to solving the border conflict under the memorandum of understanding (MoU) signed between Thailand and Cambodia in 2000.

If we look the stand of yellow group, the yellow group has always opposed the MOU. it was shown clearly that Thai PM Abhisit are trying to clean his hands from that yellow group.

“Thailand respected the World Court's 1962 ruling on the ancient temple, but has the right to protect its sovereignty if Cambodia intrudes into the disputed land,” Thai PM Abhisit was also quoted by the Bangkok Post.

As Thai PM, Mr. Abhisit understood clearly about international law on this point. In 1962, the international court of justice awarded the temple to Cambodia after Thai troops invaded in 1954 -1962 when Cambodia got independence from France in 1953 and Cambodian troops still was weak at that time.

Furthermore, Mr Abhisit said the MoU is still in effect so it should be used as a framework to settle the border dispute. On this point, he is very clear. We (Thais and Cambodians) should remember that MoU 2000 was organized by this PM because at that time in 2000, Mr. Abhisit was secretary general of Democrat party led by PM Chuan Lee Pai. Mr. Abhisit very clearly understood that MoU. Mr. Abhisit is one of top officials that set up the MoU.

Everything on MoU is known very well by this PM. One point of these things in MoU talks about border deal and other exchange prisoners but all political prisoners will not be extradited.

Now, Thai PM has tried to ignore about yellow but his blood from yellow group and therefore, he could not forget his alliance. Sometimes, he spoke one way that could survive his government before upcoming general election to seek the support from yellow group in general election and put away the MoU. But today he said MoU is still effective. This is his trick for his government to win in all battles.

Today he also revealed that he will send a letter to UN to explain about Preah Vihear temple. The letter will rebut Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen's claims that the Thai government has threatened to use military force against Cambodia, Mr Abhisit said. He has tried to show his muscle to his people before election.

Even though Thai PM said “International assistance is not needed.”. He wanted to do it bilaterally but his government always speaks unworthily. The ways how to clean hands, he should do is to terminate all his alliance with yellow group and turned to continue border deal to reach to plant the border posts with Cambodia.

One more thing, why Thailand are so fearful when Cambodia plan to sumbit the case to the International communities, this is matter that Thailand is afraid of. Thailand will lose his face and dishonor from the border deal at world class.

Clean hands with all former alliances with saving his government and his party.

Khmer Rouge Play Raises Questions on Reconciliation

Suy Heimkhemra, VOA Khmer | Phnom Penh
Tuesday, 10 August 2010

via Khmer NZ

Photo: by Jim Mizerski
A scene from the play ' Breaking the Silence.'

“I thought this story, 'Breaking the Silence,' was an encouragement to push the people who used to make mistakes to dare to confess those mistakes.”

“Breaking The Silence” is a play designed to encourage people to talk among each other about their experiences under the Khmer Rouge.

In much of Cambodia today, families still live among those who were members of the regime. They may never talk to each other or acknowledge their experiences.

“Breaking the Silence,” which was performed at Chaktomuk theater in Phnom Penh on Sunday, is a series of short skits designed to show people how they can begin a process of reconciliation.

The idea of reconciliation was highlighted by the verdict of former Khmer Rouge prison chief Duch, who received a commuted sentence of 19 years from the UN-backed tribunal last month for overseeing the torture and execution of more than 12,000 people at Tuol Sleng prison.

But following Sunday's performance, the audience was split on whether the ideas in “Breaking the Silence” can help.

“I thought this story, 'Breaking the Silence,' was an encouragement to push the people who used to make mistakes to dare to confess those mistakes,” Sok Lang, an employee of the Center for Justice and Reconciliation, told VOA Khmer after the show. “Because the story also explained that sometimes those people had committed cruel things just because of following orders.”

In his tribunal defense, Duch, whose real name is Kaing Kek Iev, said he had been following orders. He took responsibility for the crimes committed under his watch, and he asked for forgiveness from those who lost family at the prison.

Sok Lang said he wanted other Khmer Rouge cadre to publicly apologize. “And we also want those who suffered to accept the apologies, because it is the only way to reconcile our nation.”

Not everyone was convinced that reconciliation will work.

Sok Chea, another audience member, said he had lost his father, all her father's relatives, and all her mother's relatives to the Khmer Rouge.

“Therefore, what they want for reconciliation for me, by showing this play, was just on the surface of my pain,” she said. “But for my real heart, it cannot. The Khmer Rouge regime is unforgettable for me. What they want for reconciliation for us cannot make us do away with our pain.”

Government Bolsters Policy To Export Labor

Kong Sothanarith, VOA Khmer | Phnom Penh
Tuesday, 10 August 2010

via Khmer NZ

Photo: AP
Cambodia is hoping to increase the number of workers it sends abroad to absorb the some 300,000 young people entering the job market each year.

"There are more than 10,000 Cambodians working legally in Thailand, and nearly 20,000 working in Malaysia."

Cambodia is hoping to increase the number of workers it sends abroad to absorb the some 300,000 young people entering the job market each year.

In a report made public Tuesday, the government said its labor migration policy will seek to make the export of labor the second-most robust sector, following garment factories.

There are more than 10,000 Cambodians working legally in Thailand, and nearly 20,000 working in Malaysia, Seng Sakada, director general of the Ministry of Labor, told VOA Khmer. South Korea employs nearly 9,000 workers.

“They are employed especially in small and medium factories, in fishery factories and in housework,” he said.

Labor Minister Vorng Soth told reporters Tuesday these numbers were small compared to other countries, which “send millions of their citizens to work abroad.”

The UN estimates that about 300,000 youths enter the work force each year, a number expected to climb to 400,000 in the near future. The construction and garment sectors have not developed quickly enough to employ all the new workers.

Among the countries Cambodia is eying for labor export are Kuwait, Hong Kong and Sinapore, Seng Sakada said.

Dengue Outbreak Prompts Government Campaign

Chun Sakada, VOA Khmer | Phnom Penh
Tuesday, 10 August 2010

via Khmer NZ

Photo: AP
At least 10 people have died from the disease since June, with another 3,700 infected in what health officials say is a sharp increase from last year.

“We must increase health education in communes and schools, so the people can understand how to prevent dengue fever.”

Officials from the Ministry of Health met with provincial health authorities on Tuesday to begin a campaign to curb an outbreak of dengue fever.

At least 10 people have died from the disease since June, with another 3,700 infected in what health officials say is a sharp increase from last year.

“We are very concerned about the outbreak of dengue fever over the last few months,” Huy Rekol, deputy director of the Ministry of Health's dengue control department, told the meeting. “So we must have a strong response to this outbreak.”

The outbreak began at the onset of the rainy season, in June, and has spread across provinces of Banteay Meanchey, Kampong Cham, Kampong Chhnang, Kampot, and Kandal, as well as Kep and Phnom Penh.

The virus has become more potent in recent years, Kuy Rekol said.

“We must increase health education in communes and schools, so the people can understand how to prevent dengue fever,” Huy Rekol said.

Dengue is carried by mosquito, so people should kill their larvae by using the chemical known by its brand name Abate in water pots and other still water sources and fill in puddles around their houses, he said.

People should also sleep under mosquito nets at night to prevent the early morning bites of the Aedes mosquito, which carries the dengue virus, he said. The mosquitoes are most active between 5:30 am and 5:30 pm.

Beginning next week, the Ministry of Health will send around 5 tons of Abate to the worst hit provinces so that it can be distributed by local authorities.

People are also encouraged to by “seven-colored” fish from markets to put in water pots, which keep down mosquito larvae. Children should wear long sleeves and pants to prevent mosquito bites that can carry the disease, Huy Rekol said.

Cambodian FM Condemns Sanctions on Iran

http://english.farsnews.com/

via Khmer NZ

TEHRAN (FNA)- Cambodian Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation Hor Namhong on Tuesday underlined his country's strong opposition to the UN Security Council and western sanctions against Iran.

Speaking at a press conference after a meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki here in Tehran today, Namhong stressed that Cambodia condemns sanctions as it believes that the measure is not a proper option for resolving international problems.

"The sanction-based policies are condemned everywhere, and just a positive and constructive policy can solve the problems," the minister said in response to a question about Cambodia's stance on the sanctions imposed on Iran by the West and the UN Security Council.

He further noted the agenda of his talks with the Iranian foreign minister, and said that they conferred on regional and international issues.

"We talked about the situation in Iraq, the Palestinian issue, and the status quo in Afghanistan. We agreed that problems in these countries could not be resolved through war," Namhong noted.

"During the talks, we underlined further deepening and bolstering of bilateral ties," the minister said, and mentioned that he had extended an invitation to Mottaki to pay a visit to Phnom Penn in the near future.

Government, PAD putting on a show


via Khmer NZ

Published: 9/08/2010

The nationwide-broadcast of Preah Vihear Temple discussion between the Abhisit government and the People’s Alliance for Democracy (PAD) operatives on Sunday was merely a political show that benefited little to the polarization-torn nation.

Worse, it has discouraged those discreet technocrats and legal experts who have tried years after years to save the border issues distant from politicization by any government.

The PAD re-emergence has horrifyingly reminded the Thai public a prelude to the 2006 coup, a fall of the post-elected prime ministers, and the formation of coalition government under Abhisit leadership.

Meeting privately with PAD players at Ban Pitsanulok Friday, then a hyde-park-styled address to the PAD crowd at Dindaeng stadium on Saturday, and a Sunday televised discussion forum with the PAD speakers have puzzled the general mindful public why the same premier did not address the Red-Shirted crowds when they turned up in force for a change of guard of the country.

Upholding tightly to the long-lost territorial nostalgia, the well-educated, well-to-do line-ups decorating along the down-to-earth Chamlong Srimuang’s disciples has sparked a debate over the Hindu Temple dispute with neighbouring Cambodia again in light of the police on-going summoning of 80 PAD leaders on the Suvarnabhumi and Don Meuang airport sieges lawsuits.

Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva has been made to deliver a face-saving strategy by lobbying the World Heritage Committee to defer any discussions on the temple.

Two years ago, Abhisit had attacked the Samak Sundaravej government over its support (failure to block—should be more precise) Cambodia to register Preah Vihear Temple as a World Heritage Site might undermine the future Thai stand when it comes to the controversial temple and surrounding areas.

Now that the temple has become a World Heritage Site and the Cambodians has submitted its management plan to Unesco, the Democrats have awkwardly found themselves more or less in the same situation as the Samak administration. On one hand, there is nothing Thailand could have done to change the fact that the temple belongs to Cambodia.

The best dream that the Democrats-led government could reach is to try to jointly file the Temple as World Heritage and defer any attachment of the Temple heritage issue from the territorial negotiations.

After all, the MoU is just a tool for a talks and it could be revoked as said in the agreement that each party just inform within a due date their intention to renounce the agreement.

But in revoking the deal, the thankless efforts of military and foreign affairs people in responsible for the border issue in trying to get the border controversy be dealt with non-political experts with the long-term view of forging cross-border peaceful co-existence, if not prosperity—gradually vanished.

Last Friday, Thai ambassadors and diplomats who are law experts were called in at the foreign ministry meeting to shed light on the temporary success led by Natural Resource and Environment Minister Suwit Khunkitti on the controversy.

There were certainly some lessons to learn from two-year in a row Suwit’s half truth to the Thai public. Last year, Suwit claimed after returning from Seville that he succeeded in deferring the list of the temple, even though the Khmer property has already been registered a year ago as the World Heritage.

Now, he did make a heroic act by deferring the discussions on the management plan but causing confusions as his signatures at the end of the agreed minute would be unconstitutional.

In fact, it’s not. It simply showed a non-discretion and un-thoroughness of the Thai delegation, led by Minister Suwit in tip-toeing for the immediate exit of this hot potato.

At the Christchurch meeting in 2007, the Thai delegation did not have to sign anything on the document after the discussion on the Preah Vihear. The best that diplomats usually do to acknowledge the talks are to sign initials.

Now that nationalism is flying on both sides of the conflict, with Cambodia is again speaking aloud that the big nation is bullying a poor neighbouring country with a boast of readiness to wage war.

This temporary exit and lop-sided appeasing strategy of the Abhisit government is boomeranging.

Academics want pragmatic approach over border row


via Khmer NZ

Published: 9/08/2010

Critiques suggested Thailand seeks other pragmatic and less patriotically blinded approach by proposing to the World Heritage Committee the connected cultural heritage of the Preah Vihear era that situated in the Thai territory instead of trying to renounce the MoU signed in the year 2000 with Cambodia.

Morakot Jewachinda Meyer, Srinakharinwirot University’s history lecturer, said politicization with blinded nationalism of the Preah Vihear Temple issue would do no good for Thailand.

“In light of the spirit of regionalism that is being forged under the banner of Asean, should we follow the European Union lesson of turning national heritage into common European heritage to mutually reap cross-border economic and cultural prosperity like what Germany and Poland, for example, have been doing,” said Ms Morakot at a Thammasat University seminar this afternoon.

On July 2, 2004, the UNESCO inscribed the Muskau park on the World Heritage List, as an exemplary example of cross-border cultural collaboration between Poland and Germany. The English-garden-styled Park covers 3.5 square kilometres of land in Poland and 2.1 in Germany.

“Could we see this happen in Asean? Asean has so far no clear position to upgrade national heritage into a regional project of cross-cultural collaboration,” said Ms Morakot.

Thailand itself, she added, should also make a smart and far-sighted move. “To do that we need a new meaningful interpretation of sovereignty that will help transform the old-typed nationalism into mutual prosperity among neighbours,” she said.

Panat Tasneyanond, a retired law expert, said he was concerned that while Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva might look forward to delaying tactics on Preah Vihear Temple as a medium-term strategy to pressure for joint-listing of the Hindu temple but others nationalist critiques such as senior legal expert Sompong Sucharitkul still wanted the property back.

“The Thai Patriotic Group push for the renunciation of the memorandum of understanding signed in 2000 is not a smart legal-wise strategy. International norms say there must be material breach by the parties concerned. But even if Thailand renounce the MoU, Cambodia argument about their sovereignty over the Temple might drag Thailand into a confrontational border dispute with the neighbour,” said Mr Panat, former Thammasat University’s dean of law faculty.

“If we want the Temple that was ruled by the world court in 1962 as Cambodian property back, we could do it through the International Court of Justice again. Should we do it,” he noted.

“We should think it through, What if the case is forwarded to the UN Security Council as was the case two years ago? What about implications to others MoU Thailand has signed with bordering neighbours---what happens if Laos renounce MoU signed with Thailand,” said Mr Panat, former Tak senator.

Morakot said Democrat’s portraying itself as guardian of the Temple hoping to ride a patriotic tide has put the premier to daringly claim to the cheering crowd that Thailand was ready to wage war if necessary.

“But in economic and political reality as well as the military readiness, Thailand will never be ready to do so. The fall of Burapha Task Force clout since the April damage during the clash with the Red-Shirted protesters is still haunting the mindset of the people and the soldiers alike,” said Morakot.

Puangthong Rungswasdisab Pawakapan, Chulalongkorn University’s political scientist said Thai people should confront the Preah Vihear issue with a sane and fair mindset that Cambodia would never allow a joint listing of Preah Vihear Temple.

“The possible win-win exit to the dispute is to annex the Thai property such as Sa Trao as Preah Vihear Heritage buffer zone in a separate request for a listing,” said Ms Puangthong.

Akrapong Khamkoon, Thammasat University lecturer on Southeast Asian Studies, said instead of making noises about the 4.6 Sq Km overlapping claims, Thailand should make progresses on the potential world heritage such as Khao Yai and Phanom Rung.

Public protests will not help


via Khmer NZ

Published: 10/08/2010

It is easy to understand why Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva is leaning over backwards so far to try to stress agreement with the noisy protesters making an uproar around the issue of the Preah Vihear temple. On the positive side, the premier succeeded in tamping down the threat of yet another street protest and security confrontation by the self-described Thai Patriots Network. He gained some goodwill by going to last Saturday's indoor rally, and he made a couple of points about the temple issue in a televised discussion on Sunday morning. But Mr Abhisit is on the edge of lowering himself to the level of the so-called patriots. He should now cease pandering to this arm of the People's Alliance for Democracy (PAD).



The issue of the Preah Vihear temple and the disputed border - especially the disputed border - needs careful government attention. The attempt by the PAD and some of its members to take the issue to the streets is wrong-headed and ultimately harmful. Bangkokians who answered a Suan Dusit Poll on the issue realise that. A majority of respondents disagreed with the public campaign, worried about the national image overseas, and feared that the old temple dispute would divert the government's attention from real national problems. An important minority of more than 35% want a government crackdown against the protesters.

This largely silent majority of Thais is right. The issue of the temple ownership was settled in 1962. The disputed border, in particular the issue of 4.5 square kilometres of land, will never be settled by public protest. Calm and prepared diplomatic action will place the Thai land fully in the hands of Thailand. The PAD succeeded in placing one of its strong supporters in the post of the nation's chief diplomat. They should let Foreign Minister Kasit Piromya attend to this matter.

Ironically, the simmering issue of Preah Vihear temple also proves that it is past time to end the state of emergency in Bangkok and all provinces. The PAD and Thai Patriot leaders are wrong about the temple and the need for public protest. But they deserve the right to exercise free speech, which is guaranteed by the constitution but removed by the emergency law. The state of emergency forbidding any political gathering by more than five people, makes it impossible. The PAD has already broken the law once, by holding a demonstration in front of the offices of the UN cultural organisation. They did so without so much as a threat of prosecution or intervention by security forces.

By failing to enforce a provision which had earlier resulted in the detention of hundreds of other Thais, the government looked weak, divisive and hypocritical. The emergency law, contrary to the fatuous claim of the PAD, provides no exceptions for those who are more patriotic, or whose issues are more important than anyone else's. Instead of negotiating and seeming to ask for favours from the PAD, the premier can take the easiest way out of all to prevent illegal demonstrations and possibly bloody street battles with security forces: Make protests legal again by lifting the state of emergency.

Before he felt forced into negotiating with the PAD protesters, Mr Abhisit had announced a plan to handle the disagreement with Cambodia centring on the border dispute. He correctly stated that border demarcation is directly tied to the specific problem over management of temple grounds and land claimed by both countries. The prime minister should disengage from the PAD, proceed with his one-year road map about the temple region, and get back to serious national issues like the economy and the lack of freedoms due to the state of emergency.

Army: MoU is not a problem


via Khmer NZ

Published: 10/08/2010

The Thai-Cambodian memorandum of understanding on the disputed border around Preah Vihear temple signed in 2000 does not put Thailand at a disadvantage, Army Region 1 commander Kanit Sapitak said on Tuesday.

The MoU puts both countries on an equal footing, Lt Gen Kanit said.

The Cambodian army had agreed that the border row should be solved through negotiations and peaceful means and that neither side would resort to violence, he said.

"The ties between the two countries are still good, but I don't want to voice my opinion on Prime Minister Hun Sen's stance against Thailand since I'm a region leader while he is in charge of a nation," Lt Gen Kanit said.

He said the Thai army is well positioned around the disputed area and well prepared, and he believed the border issue would not be tied to local politics.

Poll: Push Cambodians out


via Khmer NZ

Published: 10/08/2010

Nearly 70 per cent of people polled recently agreed that the government should push Cambodians out of the overlapping area near Preah Vihear temple as it is Thai territory, the National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA)reported on Tuesday.

NIDA poll said this was the opinion of 69.55 per cent of respondents.

They said this should be done through peaceful means, to protect the country’s sovereignty and minimise the problem of illegal migrants, NIDA poll said.

The poll on the “Preah Vihear Temple Problem” from Aug 8-9 harvested opinions from 1,133 people in all regions of the country.

A total of 21.62 per cent of them disagreed with the majority, saying it would create more conflict between the two countries which could escalate to a war, while 8.83 per cent were not sure and wanted to hear the reactions from both sides on the ancient temple case.

Asked whether the government should revoke of the memorandum of understanding on the ancient temple made by the previous government in 2000, 40.60 per cent supported this, saying the MoU had put Thailand at a disadvantage.

But 32.13 per cent of them disagreed, and said the MoU could help prevent Cambodia trespassing in the overlapping area, and that its revocation could escalate the border dispute, while 27.27 per cent were unsure.

Some 63.55 per cent of the respondents said Thailand should not withdraw from the World Heritage agreement nor resign its membership as it would bring no good to the country and Thailand would lose the benefit of maintaining World Heritage sites in the country.

But 19.86 per cent of them agreed, saying there would be no disadvantage as Thailand can maintain its World Heritage sites without help.

Most respondents supported the idea that the government should ask the World Court to review the 1962 ruling on the right to Preah Vihear temple. They thought the verdict was unfair.

Other disagreed because the court had already given its ruling. The case should not be raised again, to prevent further conflict.

And 77.93 per cent of the respondents said the government should make the Preah Vihear temple case part of the national agenda, because it is a crucial issue.

Govt to explain temple issue to UN


via Khmer NZ

Published: 10/08/2010

The government will send a letter to the United Nations explaining the Preah Vihear temple issue, Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva said on Tuesday.

The letter will rebut Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen's claims that the Thai government has threatened to use military force against Cambodia, Mr Abhisit said.

He said Thailand was committed to solving the border conflict under the memorandum of understanding (MoU) signed between Thailand and Cambodia in 2000.

Thailand respected the World Court's 1962 ruling on the ancient temple, but has the right to protect its sovereignty if Cambodia intrudes into the disputed land.

Mr Abhisit said the MoU is still in effect so it should be used as a framework to settle the border dispute. International assistance is not needed.

Government spokesman Panithan Wattanayakorn said the Foreign Ministry planned to submit the letter to the United Nations on Wednesday morning, after Prime Minister Abhisit has signed it.

First Army commander Khanit Sapitak, who is in charge of troops in the border area, said the Cambodian army had agreed that the border row should be solved through negotiations and peaceful means, and that neither side should resort to violence.

"The ties between the two countries are still good, but I don't want to voice my opinion on Prime Minister Hun Sen's stance on Thailand since I'm a region leader while he is in charge of a nation," Lt Gen Kanit said.

He said the Thai army is well positioned around the disputed area and well prepared, and he believed the border issue would not be tied to local politics.

Lt Gen Khanit also said that the MoU signed between the two countries does not put Thailand at a disadvantage.

The MoU puts both countries on an equal footing, he said.

Meanwhile, 69.55 per cent of people questioned in a poll conducted by the National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA) agreed that the government should push Cambodians out of the overlapping area near the temple.

They said this should be done through peaceful means, to protect the country’s sovereignty and minimise the problem of illegal migrants, NIDA poll reported on Tuesday.

A total of 21.62 per cent of them disagreed with the majority, while 8.83 per cent were not sure and wanted to hear the reactions from both sides on the ancient temple case.

The poll on the “Preah Vihear Temple Problem” from Aug 8-9 harvested opinions from 1,133 people in all regions of the country.

Thai PM demands Cambodians leave border area

Thai Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva said the Cambodians had "trespassed" and must leave the border area

via khmer NZ

BANGKOK — Thai Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva on Tuesday demanded Cambodian citizens leave a disputed border area that has been the focus of deadly clashes in recent years.

The two countries have stepped up a war of words over the spat, with Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen warning it could lead to fresh bloodshed.

"We have to tell them (Cambodians) to leave," Abhisit told reporters. "They have trespassed so we are trying to evict them.

"The problem happened because Cambodia intruded into Thai territory so we have the right to protect our sovereignty and we will do everything possible through peaceful means."

Hun Sen warned Monday that the border dispute with Thailand was "very hot" and could result in violence.

Cambodia and Thailand have been locked in a troop standoff at their disputed border since July 2008, when the ancient Preah Vihear temple was granted UNESCO World Heritage status.

The World Court ruled in 1962 that the temple belonged to Cambodia, although its main entrance lies in Thailand. The exact boundary through the surrounding grounds remains in dispute, with occasional gunfights claiming several lives.

Before the most recent deadly clash, in April 2009, more than 300 Cambodians were living in a village near Preah Vihear, but they had since moved to a location further away from the temple, according to a Cambodian official.

The Thai-Cambodia border has never been fully demarcated, partly because it is littered with landmines left over from decades of war in Cambodia.

Biogas plant planned for Cambodia

via Khmer NZ

10 August 2010

In southern Cambodia the Mong Reththy Group has signed a memorandum of understanding that could see the construction of a biogas plant in Preah Sihanouk province.

The plant will convert the waste of 5,000 pigs into 270 kilovolt amperes (kVA) of electricity, which the facility will consume on-site.

According to farm owner Mong Reththy German bank KfW Bankengruppe is funding the project, although he did not disclose the amount. ‘KfW will finance the electricity generation and I am responsible for the pig farm,’ Reththy said.

The biogas generation facility will cost in the region of €5 million (€3.8 million) and is expected to be complete by September this year.

A spokesperson for KfW explained: ‘Uncontrolled livestock waste management contributes to significant air and other pollution in the vicinity of the farms.’

Fresno to Cambodia: Immigration Debate


via Khmer NZ

Posted: Aug 10, 2010

A Cambodian boy grows up as a legal resident in the central valley. Now, working and married, immigration officials are deporting him. Why? Norma Yuriar reports on his immigration debate.
 
By Norma Yuriar

Fresno, Calif. (KMPH News) — Up until last week Chantha Kong, seen here with his American wife Sharon, was on a path to becoming a U.S. Citizen. He now sits in an immigration detention center in Bakersfield waiting to be deported.

"He's crying, scared, he's never even been to Cambodia," wife Sharon Kong said. "His family was there but he was born in Thailand in a refugee camp."

Sharon says her husband and his family fled Cambodia to escape death by General Pol Pot and his Khmer Rouge communists.

"Here's the deal. He's a legal immigrant," Kong's Pastor Roger Feenstra said. "He's not here illegally. The United States brought him here with his family when he was two years old."

Now, 25 years later, Kong is being deported from Fresno to his home country. Why? His wife Sharon says her husband used poor judgement one night several years ago at a party, he held a gun in his pocket for a so–called friend. Kong was convicted on a felony weapons charge, and sentenced to one year at the Fresno County Jail.

"Once you are sentenced to 365 days you are automatically in the INS system," Sharon said. "If he had been sentenced 364 days, just one day less. He could have fought it."

"The bottom line is there are illegal immigrants living here that they should be working on sending back," Feenstra said. "This young man has turned his life around."

He says Kong has become a leader in the church's ‘Hope Now for Youth' program.

"The reason that he should stay here is because he's here legally," Pastor Feenstra said. "He's made some mistakes, he's corrected those mistakes and they are sending back to a country he has no knowledge of, he's never been there, he knows no one, he barely knows the language."

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) will not comment on Kong's case because of confidentiality requirements. But, a spokeswoman for ICE tells KMPH News that anyone in this country who is not a U.S. Citizen can be deported at any time, if they break the law.

Kong's wife says she will leave Fresno and move to Cambodia with her husband, if he's deported by the end of the month.

Thailand Asks Cambodia To Leave Encroachment Area

via Khmer NZ

By Jamaluddin Muhammad

BANGKOK, Aug 10 (Bernama) -- The Thailand-Cambodia border dispute took a new twist on Tuesday, when Thailand told Cambodians who encroached on its territory at the border, to leave.

Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva said the government had asked its foreign and defence ministries to discuss ensuring their withdrawal from the occupied territory.

However, Abhisit refused to provide details of the tasks given to the two ministries, as well as the deadline for the withdrawal.

"All the problems arose because Cambodians encroached into our areas. It is our right to protect our sovereignty," he said.

He reiterated the country's stand to use peaceful means in solving the border issue, in line with the United Nations resolution and the Thailand-Cambodia border memorandum of understanding inked in 2000.

It is not clear on the number of Cambodians alleged to have encroached in the area, as well as the size of the occupied territory as alleged by Thailand.

The two countries are at loggerheads over a 4.6 sq km area surrounding the Preah Vihear Temple, with Thailand claiming the disputed area is part of its Si Sa Kets Karntharalak district while Cambodia says it is in its Preah Vihear province.

The 11th century Hindu temple is located in the Cambodian territory as ruled by the International Court of Justice in 1962, and Unesco listed it as a world heritage site in 2008, which led to strained relationship as both countries claimed the disputed area.

Except for the border issue, Abhisit stressed that both countries enjoyed good relationship in other areas, including trade, adding that border trading was not affected by the conflict.

He also said Thailand would explain to the United Nations and Security Council based on four points in countering his Cambodian counterpart Hun Sen's allegation that Thailand threatened to use military force in solving the issue.

The points are that Hun Sen had misquoted him; the two neighbours enjoyed good relationship in other areas; Thailand would adhere to peaceful resolution and, the country respected the International Court of Justice's decision on the ownership of the temple even though it may not agree with it.

The letters to the two world bodies were in response to the letters sent by Hun Sen to the same bodies on Sunday.

Last week, the border issue heated up again when Cambodia submitted the management plan for the temple at the Unesco World Heritage Committee meeting in Brazil.

Thailand had protested as the plan included part of the disputed territory and the meeting postponed its decision on the management plan to next year's meeting in Bahrain.

Thailand Patriot Network led by People's Alliance for Democracy yellow shirts leaders held a protest in this capital last Saturday, demanding the government revoke the 2000 border memorandum of understanding.

The next day, Abhisit led the government team for a three-hour live telecast debate with the group.

It was during the debate that Abhisit stated that Thailand would use diplomacy to solve the border issue and the use of military force as the last resort, in protecting the country's sovereignty.

Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia hold children’s camp

via Khmer NZ

08/10/2010

As many as 190 children from Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia will take part in a summer camp for children in Ho Chi Minh City from August 10-14.

During the camp, the children will pay floral tribute to late president Ho Chi Minh at a museum named after him and visit Nha Rong Wharf where President Ho left for national salvation and Vietnam History Museum.

They will also visit the Sac forest-a former revolutionary base-in Can Gio district, Cu Chi tunnels and Ben Duoc temple, join in a cultural exchange programme with local children, and enjoy activities at the Dam Sen Cultural Park.

This is part of activities held by Ho Chi Minh City to mark the 2010 ASEAN when Vietnam is currently chairing the 10-member bloc. It will also provide an excellent chance for the children from 3 countries to understand more about these countries’ people and culture.

Abhisit wants Cambodians out


Prime Minister Abhisit (above) said that Cambodians had trespassed and must be evicted, promising that Thailand would 'do everything possible through peaceful means' to get the Cambodians to leave. -- PHOTO: REUTERS

via Khmer NZ

Aug 10, 2010

BANGKOK - THAI Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva on Tuesday demanded Cambodian citizens leave a disputed border area that has been the focus of deadly clashes in recent years.

The two countries have stepped up a war of words over the spat, with Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen warning that the dispute with Thailand was 'very hot' and could lead to fresh bloodshed.

Speaking to reporters, Prime Minister Abhisit said that Cambodians had trespassed and must be evicted, promising that Thailand would 'do everything possible through peaceful means' to get the Cambodians to leave.

Cambodia and Thailand have been locked in a troop standoff at their disputed border since July 2008, when the ancient Preah Vihear temple was granted UNESCO World Heritage status. The World Court ruled in 1962 that the temple belonged to Cambodia, although its main entrance lies in Thailand. The exact boundary through the surrounding grounds remains in dispute, with occasional gunfights claiming several lives.

Before the most recent deadly clash, in April 2009, more than 300 Cambodians were living in a village near Preah Vihear, but they had since moved to a location further away from the temple, according to a Cambodian official.

The Thai-Cambodia border has never been fully demarcated, partly because it is littered with landmines left over from decades of war in Cambodia. -- AFP

Tuesday, 10 August 2010

19 years for killing 16,000


via Khmer NZ

By Jonathan Gurwitz
Posted on Tue, Aug. 10, 2010

How much is a life worth? It's a question that crosses your mind when you hear about a jury deliberating a murderer's fate. Five years? Ten years? Life? A life for a life?

In cases involving one homicide, the human mind can at least comprehend the issue. A sensible debate can be had over the an appropriate punishment.

But when mass murder or genocide are involved, human faculties fail. The larger the scale of the atrocity, the less fathomable the crimes become. In a peculiar way, Stalin's observation is disturbingly accurate: One death is a tragedy; a million deaths is merely a statistic.

Last month, a United Nations-backed tribunal in Cambodia rendered a verdict in the case of Kaing Guek Eav, known as Comrade Duch. Duch was a cog in the wheel of Pol Pot's fanatical regime. Over a four-year period in the 1970s, his Khmer Rouge government presided over the murder of as many as two million of Cambodia's eight million residents in pursuit of a socialist agrarian paradise.

As commandant of the S-21 prison in Phnom Penh, Duch was responsible for the deaths - frequently by torture - of more than 16,000 people. He is the first Khmer Rouge official ever to face accountability for the Cambodian genocide.

Duch acknowledged his guilt. At times during the proceedings, he even expressed remorse. Yes, he authorized the transports that took prisoners to the killing fields. Yes, he ordered torture to extract false confessions from those deemed enemies of the state. Yes, he observed the rapes, the pulling out of toenails, the electrical shocks. "I wanted to be a good communist," he once told a journalist.

But - there's always a but - he said he had no choice. If he hadn't done Pol Pot's genocidal bidding, he would have been executed himself. He was only following orders. He was a small part in a big machine. And, anyway, he's become a born-again Christian.

The tribunal found Duch guilty of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions. It could have sentenced him to life in prison. Prosecutors had sought a 40-year sentence, which for Duch at age 67 would effectively have been a life sentence.

The tribunal, however, noted his cooperation - when he was finally apprehended after two decades in hiding - his sense of remorse, and his potential for rehabilitation. The judges sentenced him to 35 years, then shaved off 16 years for time already served and for a period of illegal detention.

If Duch serves out his full term, that amounts to a little more than 11 hours for each life he extinguished. Then as an old man in 19 years, he can go free.

One of the tribunal's international judges explained the sentence this way. "If left to the victims to decide how to punish a person," the Associated Press quoted jurist Silvia Cartwright of New Zealand, "then it would be, possibly, mob rule."

Actually, that's not accurate. Only about a dozen of the 16,000 men, women, and children who entered S-21 are believed to have survived. No mob of victims exists to exact retribution.

For the crimes for which Duch was convicted, there is no penance, there is no rehabilitation. A verdict that makes it possible for Duch to go free is an injustice to all of his victims, especially the silent mob whose voices the tribunal wasn't able to hear.

DAP News. Breaking News by Soy Sopheap

via Khmer NZ

Cambodia Tries to Eliminate Dengue Fever

Tuesday, 10 August 2010 08:59 DAP-NEWS / Vibol

CAMBODIA, PHNOM PENH, AUGUST 10, 2010-Cambodia’s health ministry on Tuesday organized a seminar for health sector in combating dengue fever a move to help local people to eliminate the diseases in the country.

Health ministry said that for seven months for this year, dengue fever killed 10 children among 3771 infected people in the country.

Dr.Duong Socheat, head of national center for combating dengue fever for health ministry said that ministry has tried to help local people and educated about the danger for illness. “We have provided health sector to help people in treatment, he added

Mostly, cases happened in Cambodia found on children and now the raining season started. That is a concern for health officials for infecting dengue fever; a virus is mosquito that was offspring in pond and water jar. “Local people need to clean their water jars and tanks to eliminate dengue fever and mosquito around their households,” Duong said, adding that ministry also has given medicine and albeit drug to put in their water jar to eliminate virus.

Most dengue fever found in Bantey Mean Chey, Kompot, Kep, Kompong Chhang, Phnom Penh, Kandal provinces.

OPINION: PRIME MINISTER HUN SEN CALLS THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL

Tuesday, 10 August 2010 08:42 administrator

CAMBODIA, PHNOM PENH, AUGUST 10, 2010- Saturday, 7 August , 2010 during a public meeting with the “People’s Alliance of Democracy”, the so-called “yellow shirts”, Mr. Abhisit, Prime Minister of Thailand, declared openly : “About the land encroachment, we will cancel the MOU if the problem can’t be settled. We will use both diplomatic and military means”.

On 14 June 2000, Cambodia and Thailand signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for the survey and demarcation of the border line between the two countries. Article 1 of this MOU stipulates that the survey and demarcation of land boundary between the two countries shall be jointly conducted in accordance with the 1904 Convention, the 1907 Treaty and its annexed Protocol and the “Maps which are the results of demarcation works of the Commissions of Delimitation of the Boundary between Indo-China and Siam set up under the Convention of 1904 and the Treaty of 1907 between France and Siam, and other documents relating to the application of the Convention of'1904 and the Treaty of 1907 between France and Siam.”

The Prime Minister of Thailand is using threats. The first one is about the unilateral cancellation of a legal document that has the value of an international treaty. This MOU is nothing less than the implementation of the judgment by the International Court of Justice that said, in 1962, that it considers that “Thailand in 1908-1909 did accept the map as representing the outcome of the work of delimitation and hence recognized the line on that map as being the frontier line, the effect of which is to situate Preah Vihear in Cambodian territory.” The Court “ feels bound, as a matter of treaty interpretation, to pronounce in favor of the line as mapped in the disputed area.” The Court stipulated that “Thailand is under the obligation to withdraw any military or police forces, or other guards or keepers, stationed by her at the Temple, or in its vicinity in Cambodian territory.”

In a letter sent today to both the Chairman of the UN General Assembly and the Chairman of the UN Security Council, Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen wrote that Thailand violates the Court judgment with troops stationing in the Keo Sikkhakiri Svarak pagoda of Cambodia.

The second threat expressed by the Thai Prime Minister is to use military force against Cambodia. Prime Minister Hun Sen underlined in his letters that Thailand, by doing so, violates two key provisions of the UN Charter that say : art 2.3 : “All Members shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered” and art 2.4 : “All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.”

Prime Minister Hun Sen requests that all the State Members of the UN and, in particular, of the UN Security Council shall be informed about the Thai threats violating both the UN Charter and the 1962 ICJ judgment.

It’s not the first time that Thailand disowns its signature. In 1952, it violated all the treaties and conventions signed during the French protectorate by sending military forces occupying the Temple and its vicinity. A military occupation that led to the ICJ decision and the evacuation of Thai troops from Cambodian territory. In 1992-1993, by cooperating with the Khmer rouge troops that were fighting UNTAC personnel and by pushing back border stones inside Cambodian territory, both activities witnessed by UNTAC observers, it violated the Paris Peace Agreement of which Thailand is signatory State, and in particular the “Agreement concerning the sovereignty, the independence, the territorial integrity and inviolability the neutrality and national unity of Cambodia.” In 2008, it violated once again all the international legal instruments on the common border.

What is the value of a Thai signature? How Thai officials do care about the legal documents they used to sign? Are these, as it was said, “only pieces of paper without biding obligations”? Who will remind the Thai Prime Minister that this is the classical language used in the 20th century by dictators, a language that led to wars and devastations?

Mr. Abhisit seems to ignore that our world is not more the world of nationalist claims. It’s not the world of the past century. It’s a globalized world where, based on legal provisions, one prefers open frontiers, free trade zones, regional stability and cooperation. Does Mr. Abhisit want to return to the past world of nationalism and conflicts full of violations of legal agreements and international law?

Svay Sitha

Secretary of State

Chairman of Press and Quick reaction Unit of the Office of the Council of Ministers

Opinions expressed are my own and do not reflect those of the Royal Government of Cambodia

ANALYSIS: ABHISIT VEJJAJIVA’S THREAT TO USE FORCES IS REAL

Tuesday, 10 August 2010 08:35 administrator

CAMBODIA, PHNOM PENH, August 10, 2010-Samdech Akka Moha Sena Pedei Techo Hun Sen, Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Cambodia has repeated several times that he, personally, and the entire nation of Cambodia knew the horrors of war and he has been doing his best to maintain peace, security and harmony for the Cambodian people. Not even fifteen years, since 1998, when Cambodia has achieved great unity for the first time under the win-win policy of the Royal Government of Cambodia, in which the Cambodian People Party (CPP) played a major role of leadership, the kingdom has embarked tirelessly in upholding the dignity of the Cambodian people, developing the country socially and economically, reducing poverty wisely and steadily, thus moving this poor nation from complete devastation caused by the war between “Khmer brothers” to a happy nation with rule of law and social justice. It is to the amazement of fair-minded prominent and ordinary foreign visitors that Cambodia has become a modern nation in Southeast Asia and an “island of peace,” a land of wonders with its rich and unique national cultural heritages in Asia and the world, a land of smile with sincerity and kindness of heart. Though it is saddening to recall this fact about the war between “Khmer brothers,” the reality and history must be kept as a lesson and a reminder that some “Khmer brothers” gave away so very much to Thailand until the latter has become much more than confident of itself, but cocky, arrogant and condescending that Cambodia must remain inferior to Thailand, and Thailand can and must take land from Cambodia whenever, whatever, and where ever as it pleases. For Thailand, it is a big mistake and it has been a big failure up until now.

The falsification of international document by Thailand

When the outcome of the war between the “Khmer brothers” seemed to be tilting against Thailand’s interests and the Thai’s easy dream to get Cambodian land, Thailand behaved as an outlaw, a criminal, and a thief by falsifying the international border line and drawing a unilateral line carving an area of “4.6 sq km” inside Cambodian territory, somewhere between 1975 and 1979, that is during the rule of the genocidal regime of Democratic Kampuchea or Khmer Rouge.

The “supposed to be secret map” produced by the Royal Thai Survey Department, an arm of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Thailand is marked “Democratic Kampuchea” on the Cambodian side of the border. In fact, between Cambodia and Thailand, there is an international border line on the Map with the title “DANGREK,” recognized and accepted in 1908-1909 by Thailand, and known as the “ANNEX I MAP” under the ICJ proceedings in 1962.

There were a total of eleven maps, which is the result of the delineation and demarcation works of the Franco-Siamese Mixed Commissions set up in conformity with the 1904 Convention and the 1907 Treaty between France and Siam that provided the finality and stability of an international border line between French Indochina and Siam. Certainly, DANGREK MAP is one among the eleven maps. Recently, Thailand has begun to intensify its campaign to mislead the international opinion by calling the DANGREK MAP, the Cambodian map. Thailand plays with words to shift the meaning of things. Thailand thinks that it is smarter than everybody in the world to the point to say with arrogance that what Thailand said is what it is, and the whole world must accept it. Thailand has failed many times about playing with words to mislead the international opinion. This time it will fail again, and badly. Suppose one day, Abhisit Vijjajeva, the “Thai Patriots” network, and the PAD (or the yellow shirts) got a common dream and question the international border line on the other ten maps beside the DANGREK MAP, then what would be the response of the international community, including the United Nations? It would not have been outside of the mark to speculate reasonably that the international community would have told Thailand to “go fishing,” or to “get lost”. With this in mind, here is the next point of this analysis.

Thailand’s threat to use military forces to occupy the “4.6 sq km” is real

The Cambodian people trust the wisdom and the farsightedness of Samdech Akka Moha Sena Padei Techo Hun Sen, Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Cambodia who is a peace-maker and a peace-keeper, a nation-builder and a patriot who will lead the nation in the defense of the national sovereignty and the territorial integrity. He has solemnly sworn to the Cambodian people that under his watch, not even an inch of the Cambodian territory will be lost. Weary of the horrors of almost a half century of war that ravaged Cambodia and Cambodian lives, he wants to build a border of peace and development both economic and social that benefit Cambodians and Thais. Will Abhisit Vejjajiva, the “Thai Patriots” network, the PAD (or the yellow shirts) keep their hands off Cambodia? They beat the war drums. The sound is getting louder each day. Similar to the question of the DANGREK MAP, Thailand has begun here, as well, to intensify its campaign to mislead the international opinion by playing with words from “an overlapping area of 4.6 sq km” to “the 4.6 sq km is Thai territory,” and as reported by the Bangkok Post Online on 9 August “Mr Abhisit agreed with the group (The Thai Patriots and the PAD) that the disputed zone belonged to Thailand and Cambodia had encroached upon Thai soil despite the temple itself being on Cambodian land.” In fact the territory is Cambodian and Cambodians have always live there. The truth is that there has been a Cambodian pagoda, a Cambodian village market, a Cambodian administrative post long before the MOU 2000, as remarked one governor of Sisaket province and reported by a Thai newspaper.

In the long history of Thailand, this country never allowed any other country to encroach its territory for a single hour, or a single day. What is wrong with Abhisit Vejjajiva, the “Thai Patriots” network, the PAD and other Thai leaders before Abhisit Vejjajiva, all of them under the same Majesty the King of Thailand to show this impossible and unthinkable stupidity to ignore the presence of the Cambodians inside the “4.6 sq km” over decades, until now? This campaign of misinformation will not stand a chance, especially at the international gatherings like ASEAN and the United Nations.

Here is a typical Thailand’s behavior with regard to the territory of its neighbor, Burma, as reported by the Nation on 8 August: “Burmese ruling junta last month shut down the Myawaddy-Mae Sot border crossing after accusing Thailand of building an embankment on the Moei River to alter the common border line.”

This confirms beyond further explanations that Thailand never allow any encroachment of its territory. In the absence of any rejection of the “Burmese accusation” by Thailand’s official and as it was reported by Thai News media, Thailand’s “building an embankment on the Moei River to alter the common border line,” must be a fact.

In light of the above, it is absolutely impossible for Thailand to fool the International community despite its ability to utilize innuendo, wild suggestion and off-basis accusations, and it is also really tough for Thailand to find listeners and backers to support its claim of Cambodia’s encroachment.

This leads, therefore, to a very well founded cognition that Thailand military threat is real. As reported by Thai media, Abhisit Vejjajiva “had instructed Foreign Minister Kasit Piromya to hold talks with Defence Minister Prawit Wongsuwon and the military to seek diplomatic means to deal with the situation.” He has not ruled out the use of force, by saying: "Resorting to force would be the last option…” He also said that “the government would use both diplomatic and military measures” to take back the “4.6 sq km”.

Pack of lies

It was just about ten days ago that Natural Resources and Environment Ministers Suwit Khunkitti has lied to the Thai people and the World by saying that“Cambodia should have handed in its management proposal six months ahead of the meeting, but it made its submission less than 24 hours before the meeting began,” as reported by the Bangkok Post On Line News on 30 July 2010, and he had also said:“the committee instead dropped the topic, saying Cambodia had not followed proper procedure in submitting the plan.”

In fact Cambodia's Management Plan of the Temple of Preah Vihear had been submitted to the World Heritage Centre before 01 February 2010, as required. Minister Suwit Khunkitti had acknowledged that “the World Heritage Centre has the document submitted by the State Party”.

As reported by the Bangkok Post Online on 8 August, 2010 Abhisit Vijjajeva intensified the campaign of misinformation with the intention to fool the international opinion by projecting a false and misleading picture of Thai actual authority on the “4.6 sq km” area, by claiming that “arrests were made when people encroached into the area in 2008 and there were clashes in April last year because of the same reason.” Actually, this is even a bigger lie than the one told by Minister Suwit Khunkitti.

The truth is that on 15 October 2008 at 14:15 Thai troops started attacking the Cambodian troops at three different places deep inside the Cambodian territory, (1) at Prolean Intry, approximately 1,120 meters South of the international boundary line, (2) at the area of Phnom Troap, 1,600 meters South of the international boundary line, (3) in the vicinity of the Keo Sikkha Kiri Svara pagoda, approximately 300 meters West of the Temple of Preah Vihear and approximately 700 meters from the international boundary line. Thai troops suffered heavy losses and were forced to withdraw from the Cambodian territory. There were no “arrests” as Abhisit Vijjajeva had lied to the Thai people and the World. On 3 April 2009 Thai troops fired rockets and heavy weapons burning to the ground the Cambodian village market near the Temple of Preah Vihear. Abhisit has played with the word “arrests” to change the picture of the truth and the fact. He will get burnt when his campaign of intoxication is exposed. This analysis leads to the conclusion that Thailand is preparing the ground for the use of forces.

What’s next?

The Cambodian nation believes in the wisdom of Samdech Techo Hun Sen to seek peace with Thailand, but she also believes in his unmatched understanding of the state of war from A to Z, and his quality of a supreme commander of the armed forces. Thailand’s threat creates an urgency and a necessity for Samdech Techo Hun Sen to send letters to H.E. Vitaly Churkin, President of the United Nations Security Council, and H.E. Ali Abdussalam Treki, President of the United Nations General Assembly, on Sunday 08 August, 2010 to inform both of them about the belligerent statement of the Prime Minister of Thailand who advocates “the military means” to settle the border demarcation.

On the other hand, against Thailand’s campaign of intoxication, misinformation and the distortion of the facts, a successful media war could have the effects of discouraging Thailand from being a fool and a bully-boy.

Pen Ngoeun

Advisor to the Office of the Council of Ministers (OCM),

Member of the Advisory Council of the Press and Quick Reaction Unit (PRU) of OCM;

This analysis is strictly personal and does not reflect under any shape or form the idea or opinion of OCM and PRU.

ASEAN, UN and USAID Conduct Major International Exercise to Prepare for Severe Pandemic

Tuesday, 10 August 2010 04:36 DAP-NEWS / Soy Sophea .CAMBODIA, PHNOM PENH, AUGUST 10, 2010-International group here on Tuesday announced that they would host a pandemic preparedness and response exercise focusing on managing the impacts of severe pandemics on societies, governments and organisations in the Southeast Asian region.

The exercise, which is a first of its kind anywhere in the world, will take place in Phnom Penh, Cambodia on 16-20 August 2010, according to a joint press statement of ASEAN, UN and USAID, adding that It is expected to attract over 170 high-level participants from governments, UN agencies, international bodies and non-governmental organisations.

“The unprecedented event aims to improve the capabilities of ASEAN Member States, both individually and collectively, to prepare for and respond to a severe pandemic with potentially devastating effects on the region,” said the release. “The exercise also sets out to improve multisectoral preparedness and response at the country, regional and global level among the Member States and other international actors.”

A severe pandemic could have hugely damaging effects on the Southeast Asia region. While many countries are engaged in meeting such a threat, much of the focus in the past has been on health area preparedness.

ASEAN Members States increasingly recognize that non-health sectors can also be gravely affected, impeding a government’s capacity to respond to a pandemic. This thinking has led to the need to come together to identify the gaps in pandemic preparedness, and to strengthen collaboration and coordination among Member States.

In expressing his appreciation for the event and emphasizing its importance, the Secretary-General of ASEAN, Dr. Surin Pitsuwan, said that ‘the table-top exercise will help us fulfill the wishes of our ASEAN leaders for our region to be ready in times of pandemics. We will use the exercise to identify our gaps in pandemic preparedness and prepare for a regional pandemic preparedness plan as called for in the ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community Blueprint. Lessons learnt from this exercise can be used not only for cases of pandemics but also for other severe events affecting our region, such as natural disasters.’

Cambodia’s National Committee for Disaster Management Vice President Dr. Nhim Vanda emphasized the value of the event to the region; ‘Cambodia was one of the first countries in Southeast Asia to focus its preparedness efforts on non-health sectors. This event provides the opportunity to bring the multisector preparedness focus to a regional level and set an example that can be followed on a global front.’

The transboundary nature of pandemics means that they seldom remain isolated within a single country. Effective regional arrangements are imperative to ensure the continuity of operations and subsequent security of a country during a pandemic. The pandemic preparedness and response exercise aims to strengthen these arrangements.